· 5/30/1979
First State Bank of Hudson County v. The United States of America
Citations
- 599 F.2d 558
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 14349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no duty in FDIC to warn bank of criminal misapplication of bank funds by bank’s president
- FDIC manual does not create an enforceable duty on the part of the FDIC to inform a bank about misapplication of its. funds by the bank’s president
- same conclusion under examination provision of Federal Deposit Insurance Act
- FDIC internal guidelines do not create duty to banks
- “When the FDIC carried out its responsibilities . . . its purpose was to safeguard this system of insurance . . . not . . . to fulfill an obligation to notify the insured bank of any unlawful banking practice.”
- same conclusion under examination provision of Federal Deposit Insurance Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seitz, Aldi-Sert, Rosenn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.