Skip to main content
· 3/16/2022

First Solar, Inc. v. National Union First Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We can find no decision, or other authority, which permits a complainant to engage in self-corroboration”
  • “These two doctrines, in a case like this, are virtually coextensive . . .”
  • “instructions were flawed [because] . . . [t]hey gave no definition of the meaning of corroboration”
  • complainant may not corroborate herself, Commonwealth must produce the person to whom she allegedly complained
  • “complainant should not be allowed to testify about the details of the complaint”
  • “fresh complaint” admissible only to corroborate complainant’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seitz C.J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.