· 10/15/1833
First Parish in Shrewsbury v. Smith
Citations
- 31 Mass. 297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 20 although the Court declined to define “how poor an entry can be and still be a judgment” it was 21 obvious that an entry that “doesn’t even say who won[] surely cannot qualify”
- docket entry that judgment filed and entered was insufficient to show substance of entry under FRCP 79(a)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.