Skip to main content
· 7/22/1895

First National Bank v. Pardee

Citations

  • 16 Mont. 390
  • 41 P. 77
  • 1895 Mont. LEXIS 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the requisite conditions for admissibility of polygraph evidence were met [because] [t]here was substantial evidence tending to indicate that appellant committed the offenses for which he was convicted, and the polygraph evidence was thus merely corroborative.”
  • setting forth the prerequisites for the admission of a polygraph exam at a criminal trial
  • for corroboration or impeachment only

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.