Skip to main content
· 6/11/1917

First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.

Citations

  • 244 U.S. 416
  • 37 S. Ct. 734
  • 61 L. Ed. 1233
  • 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1654

Syllabus

<p>By the principles fully settled in McCulloch v. Maryland and Osborn v. Bank, and other cases, the implied power of Congress to confer a particular function upon a national bank is to be tested, not by the nature of the function viewed by itself, but by its relations to all the functions, and attributes of the bank considered as an entity; the necessity or appropriateness of the function should be considered with reference to the situation to which it relates; and, as to what is necessary or appropriate, a court should not substitute its judgment for the judgment of Congress.</p> <p>As settled also by those cases, the circumstance that a function is of a class subject to state regulation does not prevent Congress from authorizing a national bank to exercise it; nor would it lie with the state power to forbid this.</p> <p>A business not inherently such that Congress may emppwer national banks to engage in it may nevertheless become appropriate to their functions if, by state law, state banking corporations, trust companies, or other rivals of national banks are permitted to carry it on.</p> <p>Section 11 (k) of the Act of December 23,1913, establishing the Federal Reserve Board, in authorizing the board “To,-grant by special permit to national banks applying therefor, when not in contravention of state or local law, the right to act as trustee, executor, administrator, or registrar of stocks and bonds under such rules and regulations as the said board may prescribe,” is, as here construed, á valid exercise of the power of Congress.</p> <p>The section authorizes the specified functions to be exercised by national banks when the right to perform them is given by state law, or is deducible therefrom through being sd conferred on state banks or corporations whose business in some degree rivals that of national banks; and it gives administrative power to the Reserve Board as a means of coordinating .such functions,' in their exercise by national banks, with the reasonab

Judges: White, Van Devanter, Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.