First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. Notte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding \that whether the misrepresentation was material. . . w[as] [a] question[] for the jury\
• stating that a contract fraudulently induced is void or voidable and a party fraudulently induced to enter into a contract \has the election of either rescission or affirming the contract and seeking damages\
• stating that a contract fraudulently induced is void or voidable and a party fraudulently induced to enter into a contract \has the election of either rescission or affirming the contract and seeking damages\
• adopting this formulation as it appeared in a tentative draft of the Restatement (Second)
• explaining that to void a contract on the basis of fraudulent inducement, the party seeking rescission must demonstrate that the other party to the contract intentionally misrepresented the facts \to induce a party to manifest his assent... \ (quoting Restatement (Second
• discussing Remington Sewing Machine Co. v. Kezertee, 49 Wis. 409, 414, 5 N.W. 809 (1880

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).