First National Bank of Louisville v. Loretta Lustig, Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and Federal Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing fabrication of evidence as “the most egregious conduct” and as “fraud on the court”
• “To establish fraud on the court, it is necessary to show an unconscionable plan or scheme which is designed to improperly influence the court in its decision.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• Court expressed its “dismay” at the failure of the district judge to recuse himself in light of his substantial holdings of stock in the plaintiff, but found the error under 28 U.S.C. § 455 to be “harmless.”
• “Experts may rely on hearsay evidence in forming their opinions.”
• “Experts may rely on hearsay evidence in forming their opinions.”
• “Experts may rely on hearsay evidence in forming their opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).