First National Bank of Geneva v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “CAFA provides no basis for federal jurisdiction” 16 over a PAGA action
• explaining that, on a facial attack, courts must “[a]ccept[] 16 the plaintiff's allegations as true and draw[] all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's 17 favor”
• following Grasso v. McDonough Power Equip., 264 Cal. App. 16 2d 597, 601 (1968)
• extending the “objective deliberate indifference 16 standard” articulated in Castro to inadequate medical care
• court should permit amendment unless pleading could not 16 possibly be cured by allegation of other facts
• district court should grant leave to amend unless pleading could 16 not possibly be cured by allegation of other facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).