First National Bank of Boston v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statements that a cellphone tower was an \eyesore\ and general opposition to the project were rejected as incompetent opinion testimony and did not support denial of the CUP
• \[C]ompetent evidence is generally defined as synonymous with admissible evidence[.]\
• “[C]ompetent evidence is generally defined as synonymous with admissible evidence[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).