First National Bank of Beeville v. Fojtik

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a reservation contained in a motion to enter judgment preserved the movants’ right to complain of the judgment
• stating that “[t]here must be a method by which a party who desires to initiate the appellate process may move the trial court to render judgment without being bound by its terms” and a party should include a reservation of rights in any such motion for entry of judgment
• motion for judgment contained statement that plaintiff agreed only as to the form of the judgment but disagreed with the content and result
• no waiver when plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment referenced plaintiffs’ motion for new trial, stated that plaintiffs agreed only with form of judgment, and specified plaintiffs’ disagreement with content and result of judgment
• no waiver when plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment referenced plaintiffs’ motion for new trial, stated that plaintiffs agreed only with form of judgment, and specified plaintiffs’ disagreement with content and result of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).