Skip to main content
· 4/2/1986

First National Bank in Marlinton v. Blackhurst

Citations

  • 345 S.E.2d 567
  • 176 W. Va. 472
  • 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 820
  • 1986 W. Va. LEXIS 470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “the usual remedy for a violation of the West Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility is a disciplinary proceeding against the attorney”
  • recognizing that \the usual remedy for a violation of the West Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility is a disciplinary proceeding against the attorney\
  • question whether new trial should be granted due to strategy of counsel rests in discretion of trial judge
  • “[T]he usual remedy for a violation of the West Virginia Code of Professional Responsibility is a disciplinary1 proceeding against the attorney”
  • “In the present case, [the defendant] denied the genuineness of his. signature and introduced a financial statement bearing his signature into evidence. Accordingly, this evidence was substantial enough to remove the presumption in favor of the bank.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.