First Nat. Bank v. Richardson
Citations
- 123 La. 723
- 49 So. 485
- 1909 La. LEXIS 772
Syllabus
<p>Certiorari (§ 5*) — Prohibition (§ 3*) — Grounds oe Remedy — Existence oe Remedy by Appeal.</p> <p>Where plaintiff stated that he would not move for a new trial, but would acquiesce in defendant’s application, and counsel for one of defendants objected to a new trial, when the matter was referred to another day, when a new trial was granted, any error in granting the new trial without a motion therefor was reviewable by appeal, and hence certiorari and prohibition would not lie to review the ruling.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Certiorari, Cent. Dig. §§ 5, 6; Dee. Dig. § 5*; Prohibition, Cent. Dig. §§ 4^-19; Dec. Dig. § 3.*]</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding tribal autonomy undermined by promissory note’s requirements including provisions that deemed entity in default in the event of any “Adverse Tribal Government Action” or “Adverse Change of Tribal Law.”
- finding tribe’s receipt of “drastically smaller percentage” of revenue weighed heavily against sovereign immunity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.