First Nat. Bank v. Linn Co. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a landlord’s contractual duties to other tenants were a permissible consideration in its reasonable accommodation analysis concerning a disabled tenant
• “As a matter of law, the [neighbor’s] rights did not have to be sacrificed on the altar of reasonable accommodation.”
• “Groner was unable to demonstrate that either of these proposed accommodations was reasonable.”
• “Because the Fair Housing Act adopted the concept of a “reasonable accommodation” from § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 791, cases interpreting that term under the Rehabilitation Act also apply to claims under the Fair Housing Act.”
• “Because the Fair Housing Act adopted the concept of a “reasonable accommodation” from § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 791, cases interpreting that term under the Rehabilitation Act also apply to claims under the Fair Housing Act.”
• “[W]hile some courts have imposed an obligation on employers and employees to engage in an interactive process, there is no such language in the Fair Housing Act . . . that would impose such a duty on landlords and tenants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).