Skip to main content
· 9/21/1928

First Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank

Citations

  • 28 F.2d 290
  • 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding non-officer executive board members did not perform traditional employee duties and therefore were not employees for purposes of Title VII jurisdiction
  • observing that “sex-based' discrimination, including sexual harassment, may, be actionable under § 1983 .as a violation of equal protection”
  • observing that “sex-based discrimination, including sexual harassment, may be actionable under § 1983 as a violation of equal protection”
  • “[m]ere employment by a state or municipality does not automatically mean that a defendant’s actions are taken under the color of state law”
  • “Title VII is an employment law, available only to employees (or prospective employees) seeking redress for the unlawful employment practices of their employers.”
  • “Title VII is an employment law, available only to employees (or prospective employees) seeking redress for the unlawful employment practices of their employers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.