· 9/21/1928
First Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank
Citations
- 28 F.2d 290
- 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding non-officer executive board members did not perform traditional employee duties and therefore were not employees for purposes of Title VII jurisdiction
- observing that “sex-based' discrimination, including sexual harassment, may, be actionable under § 1983 .as a violation of equal protection”
- observing that “sex-based discrimination, including sexual harassment, may be actionable under § 1983 as a violation of equal protection”
- “[m]ere employment by a state or municipality does not automatically mean that a defendant’s actions are taken under the color of state law”
- “Title VII is an employment law, available only to employees (or prospective employees) seeking redress for the unlawful employment practices of their employers.”
- “Title VII is an employment law, available only to employees (or prospective employees) seeking redress for the unlawful employment practices of their employers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.