Skip to main content
· 11/11/1889

First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. Morgan

Citations

  • 132 U.S. 141
  • 10 S. Ct. 37
  • 33 L. Ed. 282
  • 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1851

Syllabus

<p>The exemption of national banks from suits- in state courts m counties other than the county or city in which the association was located, granted by the act of February 18,1875,18 Stat. 316, c. 80, was a personal privilege which could be waived by appearing to such a suit brought in another county, but in a court of the same dignity, and making defence without claiming the immunity granted by Congress.</p> <p>The provision in the act of July 12, 1882, 22 Stat. 163, c. 290, § i, respecting suits by or against national banks, refers only to suits brought after the passage of that act.</p> <p>A national bank was sued to recover interest alleged to have been usuriously exacted. The (complaint which was sworn to January 13, 1883, charged that the usurious transactions took place “ after the 12th day of February, 1877, and before the commencement of this action, to wit, on the 25th day of May, 1878, and at other times and dates subsequent thereto.” The defendant answered generally and set up the statute of limitations. The jury found that usurious interest had been taken during the two years next before the commencement of the action, and rendered a verdict for plaintiff, on which judgment was entered. The defendant moved in arrest of judgment, and also for a new trial, on the ground of a variance between the pleadings and proof: Held, that, although the complaint might have been more specific, enough was alleged to sustain the judgment.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A suit against a national bank to recover back twice the amount of interest illegally taken by it is a suit to recover a penalty incurred under a law of the United States....\
  • “A suit against a national bank to recover back twice the amount of interest illegally taken by it is a suit to recover a penalty incurred under a law of the United States . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.