FIRST NAT. BANK IN MITCHELL v. Daggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the first type of creditor's bill as \an 'equitable assets' creditor's bill\
• disregarding choice-of-law provision because the chosen state had no contacts with the transaction and the parties, and application of the chosen state’s law would offend a strong public policy in the forum state
• denying the application of Georgia state law because the parties have no contacts within Georgia, no parties are from the state, and the subject matter is not in Georgia
• disregarding choice-of-law provision because the chosen state had no contacts with the transaction and the parties, and application of the chosen state’s law would offend a strong public policy in the forum state
• referring to the first type of creditor’s bill as “an ‘equitable assets’ creditor’s bill”
• disregarding choice-of-law provision because the chosen state had no contacts with the transaction and the parties, and application of the chosen state’s law would offend a strong public policy in the forum state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).