Skip to main content
· 4/22/1993

First Midwest Bank/Danville v. Hoagland

Citations

  • 613 N.E.2d 277
  • 244 Ill. App. 3d 596
  • 184 Ill. Dec. 250
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in indirect civil contempt proceedings due process requires notice of the charges, “an adequate description of the facts upon which the contempt charge is based,” and that notice must be provided “within a reasonable time in advance of the hearing”
  • reversing the trial court’s finding of indirect civil contempt because of the defendant’s compliance
  • reversing the trial court's finding of indirect civil contempt because of the defendant's compliance
  • distinguishing civil contempt sanctions, such as plaintiff’s, from criminal contempt sanctions
  • distinguishing civil contempt sanctions, such as plaintiff’s, from criminal contempt sanctions
  • “An alleged contemnor may waive formal written notice by voluntarily appearing in court and defending against the charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.