First Florida Bank v. MAX MITCHELL & CO., PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in the absence of privity there can be no liability on the part of an accountant for even gross negligence, unless it amounts to fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• First Fla. Bank, NA v. Max Mitchell & Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-03-08· cited 85×
• Colonial Bank v. Ridley & Schweigert
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-09-22· cited 34×
• First National Bank of Bluefield v. Crawford
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-11-03· cited 23×
• Citizens National Bank v. Kennedy & Coe
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-06-09· cited 19×
• Durham v. Palm Court, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-01-24· cited 6×
• Forster v. Durham
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• 1ST AMERICAN TITLE INS. v. 1st Title Serv. Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-28· cited 75×
• Investment Corporation of Florida v. Buchman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-02-28· cited 27×
• Lorraine v. Grover, Ciment, Weinstein & Stauber, PA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-05· cited 22×
• Gordon v. ETUE, WARDLAW & CO., PA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-23· cited 13×