First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Warner Robins v. Ohio Valley Savings & Loan Ass'n of Steubenville, Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]here the activities sought to be enjoined have already occurred, and the appellate courts cannot undo what has already been done, the action is moot”
• holding that “[w]here the activities sought to be enjoined have already occurred, and the appellate courts cannot undo what has already been done, the action is moot”
• where activities sought to be enjoined had already occurred, the action was moot
• where all work on exploratory mining operation had ceased, and the appellate court could not undo what had been done, a challenge to the approval of the drilling based on alleged lack of compliance with NEPA was moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).