Skip to main content
· 7/22/1993

First Deposit National Bank v. Pursley (In Re Pursley)

Citations

  • 158 B.R. 664
  • 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1330
  • 1993 WL 359842

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof that at the time the debt- or used the credit card he knew or should have known that he would be unable to repay the charges incurred constitutes false pretenses, a false representation or actual fraud
  • couple with $15 per month left after expenses could not reasonably have intended to repay $5,000 credit card advance
  • following the “implied representation” theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.