First Commonwealth Bank v. Heller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the logic of the restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, but compelled by stare decisis to deny subrogation
• finding the logic of the Restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, but compelled by stare decisis to deny subrogation
• recognizing the first in time principle
• “While we find the logic of the Restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, we are bound by principles of stare decisis and accordingly, must find the trial court properly determined appellant is not entitled to the remedy of equitable subrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).