Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/16/2004

First Commonwealth Bank v. Heller

Citations

863 A.2d 1153
2004 Pa. Super. 431
2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding the logic of the restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, but compelled by stare decisis to deny subrogation
finding the logic of the Restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, but compelled by stare decisis to deny subrogation
recognizing the first in time principle
“While we find the logic of the Restatement to be compelling and very persuasive, we are bound by principles of stare decisis and accordingly, must find the trial court properly determined appellant is not entitled to the remedy of equitable subrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyce, Tamilia, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named First Commonwealth Bank v. Heller

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

First Commonwealth Bank v. Heller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-10-18· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.