Skip to main content
· 10/3/1984

First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. Guex

Citations

  • 677 S.W.2d 25
  • 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 712
  • 28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 13
  • 1984 Tex. LEXIS 397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the legislature had intended recovery of attorney’s fees under [section 9.507(a) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code], they would no doubt have provided for it_”
  • \[A]n award of attorney's fees may not be supplied by implication but must be provided for by the express terms of the statute in question.\
  • “If the legislature had intended recovery of attorney’s fees under [section 9.507(a) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code], they would no doubt have provided for it, just as they provided for the recovery of attorney’s fees under the [DTPA]-”
  • “It is the sole province of the trier of fact, here the jury, to judge the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.”
  • “[o]bviously the drafters of the Uniform Commercial Code intended . . . to penalize the secured party if the debtor suffered no losses or his losses were less that the statutory penalty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilgarlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.