First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc. v. Toyobo America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that complaint was “more than sufficient to meet the heightened pleading standards of Rule 9(b
• holding 9(b) standard met where supplier misrepresented the quality and condition of product it sold by listing examples of misrepresentations and fraudulent omissions on the part of defendant
• finding that complaint was “more than sufficient to meet the heightened pleading standards of Rule 9(b)” where plaintiff alleged “at least 25 examples of intentional misrepresentations or fraudulent omissions made by [the defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).