· 7/15/1996
First Bank v. First Bank System, Inc. And First Bank, Fsb, Formerly Known as Metropolitan Federal Bank, Fsb
Citations
- 84 F.3d 1040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a suggestive mark is one that requires some measure of imagination to reach a conclusion regarding the nature of the product
- noting that asking to clarify an affiliation “indicates a distinction in the mind of the questioner, rather than confusion.”
- explaining that, under 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b), registration of mark is prima facie evidence of validity
- defining secondary meaning as the association in consumers' minds of a mark with a particular source
- finding evidence of misdirected mail and phone calls “de minimis” demonstrating “inattentiveness on the part of the caller or sender rather than actual confusion”
- discussing the plaintiff’s similar elements of proof in a Lanham Act claim asserting a common-law trademark
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.