Skip to main content
· 7/15/1996

First Bank v. First Bank System, Inc. And First Bank, Fsb, Formerly Known as Metropolitan Federal Bank, Fsb

Citations

  • 84 F.3d 1040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a suggestive mark is one that requires some measure of imagination to reach a conclusion regarding the nature of the product
  • noting that asking to clarify an affiliation “indicates a distinction in the mind of the questioner, rather than confusion.”
  • explaining that, under 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b), registration of mark is prima facie evidence of validity
  • defining secondary meaning as the association in consumers' minds of a mark with a particular source
  • finding evidence of misdirected mail and phone calls “de minimis” demonstrating “inattentiveness on the part of the caller or sender rather than actual confusion”
  • discussing the plaintiff’s similar elements of proof in a Lanham Act claim asserting a common-law trademark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.