Skip to main content
· 12/14/1982

First Bank of Oak Park v. Carswell

Citations

  • 443 N.E.2d 755
  • 111 Ill. App. 3d 71
  • 66 Ill. Dec. 829
  • 1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 2564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing the predecessor statute to section 2-1105(a) and the then-current version of Rule 182.
  • subsequent jury demand was untimely where defendant did not appear in court on the date that summons advised him that his personal appearance was required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.