First Bank (N.A.) — Billings v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that severe emotional distress is only a new interpretation of the existing “significant impact” requirement
• adopting § 46, comment j, relating to the tort of emotional distress
• adopting § 46, comment j, relating to the tort of emotional distress
• court has duty of determining threshold question of whether any proof of severe emotional distress exists sufficient to raise question of fact for jury
• disapproving of recovery for loss of sleep and nervous tension
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, cmt. j

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).