Skip to main content
· 11/30/1994

Firouzabadi v. First Judicial District Court

Citations

  • 885 P.2d 616
  • 110 Nev. 1348
  • 1994 Nev. LEXIS 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a prima facie case of specific personal jurisdiction had been shown for an out-of-state defendant who traveled to Nevada to attend a trade show
  • for purposes of specific jurisdiction, claims must have a specific and direct relationship or be intimately related to the forum
  • “As no appeal lies from an order quashing service of process, a petition for a writ of mandamus is the proper means by which to challenge such an order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.