Firotto v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that matter was no longer “pending” where it “was decided and settled, regardless of whether [appellant] had notice of the denial on that date”
• holding that when prisoner diligently seeks information about the status of his case, the limitations period may be equitably tolled until he receives notice of its denial
• holding matter was no longer ‘pending’ where it ‘was decided and settled, regardless of whether [appellant] had notice of the denial on that date’
• holding equitable tolling may be available where petitioner alleged receipt of notice denying state writ four months after decision
• holding matter was no longer ‘pending’ where it ‘was decided and settled, regardless of whether [appellant] had notice of the denial on that date’
• indicating that delay of four months “could qualify for equitable tolling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).