Skip to main content

Firestone v. State

Citations

  • 838 N.E.2d 468
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2259
  • 2005 WL 3211662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding crimes of rape and criminal deviate conduct were not continuous but separate and distinct crimes where defendant raped victim then forced her to perform oral sex on him afterward
  • finding that the defendant’s 13 convictions for rape and criminal deviate conduct did not violate the continuing crime doctrine despite the “continuity of the actions” because they were different sexual acts committed at different times
  • convictions for rape and criminal deviate conduct did not violate continuing crime doctrine; Firestone committed different acts at different times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Baker, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.