Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth Mazda, Inc. v. CHRYSLERM CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• existing dealership agreement between parties does not mean that subsequent action by one party cannot be in violation of a new provision of the Act
• a “vested right is more than a mere expectation based upon an anticipated continuance of existing law; it must have become a fixed right, complete and consummated”
• denying retroactive application of the 1983 amendments at issue here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).