Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. Brinkmeyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court reviewing for substantial evidence “may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on controverted issues of fact” because the question to be determined “is strictly one of law”
• stating that a court reviewing for substantial evidence “may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency on 12 controverted issues of fact” because the question to be determined “is strictly one of law”
• discussing limited nature of review of police officer’s appeal from adverse Commission ruling and reviewing it under traditional principles of administrative law
• reviewing courts need not consider “incredible, perjured, or unreasonable testimony because such evidence is not substantial.”
• discussing limited nature of review of police officer's appeal from adverse Commission ruling and reviewing it under traditional principles of administrative law
• reviewing court “may not substitute 11 its judgment for that of the agency on controverted issues of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).