Skip to main content
· 12/15/1994

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McDonald, Hecht & Solberg

Citations

  • 30 Cal. App. 4th 1373
  • 36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 424
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 17636
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9554
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[RJegardless whether styled as a claim for subrogation, indemnity or contribution, the gravamen of Insurers’ claim was legal malpractice as Insureds’ actionable injury was allegedly the result of Law Firm’s professional negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kremer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.