Fire and Police Pension Assoc v. Abiomed, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an increase in stock holdings during the Class Period on the part of a defendant “negate[d] any inference that he had a motive to artificially inflate [the company’s] stock during that period”
• rejecting plaintiffs’ argument that the lower court erred in denying leave to amend the complaint where they had notice of the deficiencies in the complaint but took no action to amend until after complaint was dismissed
• “We wish to discourage this practice of seeking leave to amend after the case has been dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).