Skip to main content
· 9/28/1981

Fircrest Supply, Inc. v. Plummer

Citations

  • 634 P.2d 891
  • 30 Wash. App. 384
  • 1981 Wash. App. LEXIS 2706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the claimant’s typed name in the verification statement and the notary’s signature following the statement indicated that the claimant swore that the claim was just
  • “[A] lien claimant will frequently fill out the claim form himself. It does not appear that the legislature intended to burden the construction industry with the obligation to research title before each claim of lien.”
  • lien claim substantially complied with RCW 60.04.091 although the claimant did not sign the lien because the notary’s signature following the claimant’s typed name indicated that the claimant verified the claim in the notary’s presence
  • lien claim substantially complied with RCW 60.04.091 although the claimant did not sign the lien because the notary's signature following the claimant's typed name indicated that the claimant verified the claim in the notary's presence
  • legal description unnecessary if street address provided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.