Supreme Court· 10/15/1974
Fiorella v. United States
Citations
- 419 U.S. 885
- 95 S. Ct. 157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the scienter element in the statute prohibiting the mailing of obscene material required only that the defendant know the content of the material, not that it was legally obscene
- indictment serves both to apprise defendant of charge and as a bar to future jeopardy
- corporation issued promissory notes in exchange for assets of film processing and optical business
- corporation issued promissory notes in exchange for assets of film processing and optical business
- international arbitration clause held enforceable when in conflict with federal securities laws
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Other cases named Fiorella v. United States
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.