Supreme Court· 10/15/1974
Fiorella v. United States
Citations
- 419 U.S. 885
- 95 S. Ct. 157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the scienter element in the statute prohibiting the mailing of obscene material required only that the defendant know the content of the material, not that it was legally obscene
- indictment serves both to apprise defendant of charge and as a bar to future jeopardy
- corporation issued promissory notes in exchange for assets of film processing and optical business
- corporation issued promissory notes in exchange for assets of film processing and optical business
- international arbitration clause held enforceable when in conflict with federal securities laws
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- United States v. Wesley WillieTenth Circuit· 1991-08-12· cited 167×
- United States v. William B. Prince, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1989-02-14· cited 131×
- United States v. Anthony Robert Martin-TrigonaSeventh Circuit· 1982-07-16· cited 79×
- State v. JolySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 78×
- Crescent International, Inc. v. Avatar Communities, Inc. And Smede International, Inc.Third Circuit· 1988-09-29· cited 75×
- Sharon R. SMITH Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAPP CLINIC, P.A., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1987-02-02· cited 70×
- United States v. Betty SalisburySixth Circuit· 1993-04-05· cited 59×
- Thomas McCabe v. Daniel RattinerFirst Circuit· 1987-03-30· cited 50×
- Bob T. Moore and Susan Moore v. Ashland Chemical, Inc. And Ashland Oil, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1997-11-12· cited 44×
- Kobos by and Through Kobos v. EvertsWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-01-17· cited 43×
- Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2009-11-30· cited 43×
- Lutz Farms v. Asgrow Seed Co.Tenth Circuit· 1991-10-25· cited 43×
- AM. BOOKSELLERS ASS'N, INC. v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-08-24· cited 41×
- State v. OropezaIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-01-12· cited 39×
- Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-15· cited 39×
- Envirolite Enterprises, Inc. v. Glastechnische Industrie Peter Lisec Gesellschaft M.B.H.S.D. New York· 1985-10-03· cited 27×
- People v. DercoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-02-04· cited 26×
- In re Independent Gasoline Antitrust LitigationD. Maryland· 1978-06-08· cited 25×
- La Societe Nationale Pour La Recherche, La Production, Le Transport, La Transformation Et La Commercialisation Des Hydrocarbures v. Shaheen Natural Resources Co.S.D. New York· 1983-11-15· cited 23×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Fiorella v. United States
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.