Fiore v. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “focus of this exception is on parallel in rem proceedings — one in federal court, the other in state court”
• noting that this basis typically refers to cases where a court is protecting an earlier federal injunction, such as in school desegregation cases
• “[T]he sole relevant inquiry is whether the injunction qualifies for one of the exceptions to the Anti-Injunction Act.”
• “Any doubt regarding whether the requirements of res judicata have been met will be resolved against interference with the state court proceeding.”
• “Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.” (quoting Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 514, 7 Wall. 506, 514 (1868))
• “Section 1447(d) bars not only appellate review of a remand order, but also reconsideration of the order by the remanding district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).