Fiorani v. Navy Federal Credit Union

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding and holding that recognizing federal jurisdiction over State of Oregon’s claims for violations of the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act would disrupt balance between state and federal judicial responsibilities
• remanding, finding that the state law consumer protection claims were not completely preempted by the FDCA, and noting that the “fact that there is no private right of action under the FDCA does not, however, displace all other causes of action that incorporate FDCA standards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).