Finstad v. Washburn University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an “aggrieved consumer” must suffer a loss or injury resulting from a violation of the KCPA
• clarifying that aggrievement refers “only to those who have rights which may be enforced at law and whose pecuniary interest may be affected” (quoting Fairfax Drainage Dist. v. Kansas City, 374 P.2d 35, 41 (Kan. 1962))
• denying court reporting students' lawsuit that Washburn was negligent \in the conduct and supervision of the court reporting program\
• denying court reporting students’ lawsuit that Washburn was negligent “in the conduct and supervision of the court reporting program”
• finding no causal connection where enrolled students were unaware the deceptive advertising statements had been made about the school or had enrolled before they were published
• finding no causal connection where enrolled students were unaware the deceptive advertising statements had been made about the school or had enrolled before they were published

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).