Finol v. Finol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing petition for certiorari in which petitioner asserted his billing and payment records were protected by the attorney-client privilege and not subject to discovery
• upholding order which allowed discovery of attorney billing information but advising that “descriptions of services rendered which would reveal the mental impressions and opinions of counsel” should be redacted
• attorney-client privilege does not protect retainer agreements, nor billing and payment records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).