Finney v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirements are relaxed” with regard to claims for fraudulent concealment based upon omissions because “omissions cannot be described in terms of the time, place, and contents of the misrepresentation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).