Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/28/1996
Finney v. Bransom
Citations
- 924 P.2d 319
- 143 Or. App. 154
- 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1340
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- summaryjudgment reversed because a genuine issue of material fact was created by arguably inadmissable hearsay evidence; defendant failed to object to evidence at trial court, so it was considered on appeal
- trial court retains discretion to deny amendment under ORCP 23 B
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Warren, Armstrong, Riggs, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Finney v. BransomOregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 15×
- Cooksey v. Portland Public School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-09-18· cited 14×
- Fraker v. Benton County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-22· cited 12×
- Lourim v. SwensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-16· cited 11×
- Bend Tarp and Liner, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-10· cited 9×
- Permapost Products Co. v. Osmose, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 8×
- Minisce v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 6×
- Brownstein, Rask, Arenz, Sweeney, Kerr & Grim v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 4×
- Dority v. HillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-08-25· cited 3×
- Levine v. Alpha Anesthesia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-01-22· cited 1×
- White v. Mac Air Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-24· cited 1×
- Heiner v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-22
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Jane Doe v. Taylor Independent School District, Mike Caplinger in His Official Capacities and Eddy Lankford in His Official and Individual CapacitiesFifth Circuit· 1994-03-03· cited 600×
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-10· cited 371×
- Wold v. WoldSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 312×
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court· 1989-08-29· cited 155×
- Shong-Ching Tong v. Assured Thrift & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 127×
- Snider v. Temple UniversitySupreme Court· 1992-01-13· cited 93×
- Rachel Castner v. First National Bank of Anchorage, Arctic Cold Storage, Inc., and Union Bank of AnchorageFirst Circuit· 1960-03-24· cited 83×
- Gary Plastic Packaging Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Second Circuit· 1985-02-21· cited 78×
- Nl Industries, Inc. v. Ghr Energy Corporation, Southern States Exploration, Inc., and S.A. Holditch & Associates, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 75×
- Howard B. Samuels v. Jack WilderSeventh Circuit· 1989-04-11· cited 59×
- Susan E. Johnson v. Educational Testing ServiceFirst Circuit· 1985-01-31· cited 57×
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 54×
- Feldman v. Jackson Memorial HospitalSupreme Court· 1985-06-24· cited 49×
- Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court· 1966-02-24· cited 36×
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1965-02-23· cited 34×
- Lankford v. DoeSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 33×
- Gabel v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court· 1918-02-26· cited 19×
- Hussey v. HuntsingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-06· cited 17×
- Navas v. City of SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-04· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.