Skip to main content
· 5/11/1948

Finnerty v. Wallen

Citations

  • 77 F. Supp. 508
  • 78 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 58
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a “notice and cure provision . . . would essentially amount to a waiver of TILA's initial account-opening disclosure requirements, because Defendant would be able to provide deficient initial disclosures and remedy them only after the contract was signed”
  • explaining that “the purpose of TILA is to allow borrowers to compare available credit and billing terms before entering into a contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roche

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.