Skip to main content
· 4/24/1972

Finnegan v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.

Citations

  • 290 A.2d 286
  • 60 N.J. 413
  • 1972 N.J. LEXIS 256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was for the jury to determine whether the substitution of an electrical pedal for a mechanical treadle on a power press was a substantial change within the meaning of the Restatement’s Section 402A so as to relieve the manufacturer of liability
  • holding that it was for the jury to determine whether the substitution of an electrical pedal for a mechanical treadle on a power press was a substantial change within the meaning of the Restatement's Section 402A so as to relieve the manufacturer of liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Proctor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.