Supreme Court of Arkansas· 10/26/1990

Finn v. McCuen

Citations

798 S.W.2d 34
303 Ark. 418
1990 Ark. LEXIS 491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

The Secretary of State's determination of sufficiency includes both the ballot title and the signatures.
where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title
where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title
where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern, Price, Dudley, Hays, Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

325 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Finn v. McCuen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Finn v. McCuen
Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-09-26

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.