Finlen v. Heinze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that a Uniform Traffic Ticket properly charges the defendant with an offense when it describes the nature of the offense . . . and makes reference to the ordinance that gives rise to the offense . . . .”
• stating that defendant should have objected
• “A Uniform Traffic Ticket effectively charges an offense even if the defendant has to make some reasonable inquiry in order to know exactly what offense is charged.”
• “[A] complaint prepared pursuant to Traf.R. 3 simply needs to advise the defendant of the offense with which he is charged, in a manner that can be readily understood by a person making a reasonable attempt to understand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).