Finlayson v. Cabarrus Bank & Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, inter alia, that differences in state express-warranty laws defeated predominance requirement
• applying Illinois conflicts jurisprudence to find that law of state where each plaintiff resides applies to claims for breach of warranty
• applying law of state where each plaintiff resides to breach-of-warranty claims
• “The variations in state law [of warranty] presented by this case defeat predominance and manageability ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).