Finlay v. Olive

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, after scrutinizing final judgment and transcript from hearing, it was “clear that the trial court did not make such a finding”
• providing that trial court may impose sanctions pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 215, concerning abuse of discovery process, only after notice and hearing
• noting that the postponement of “rulings on completed pretrial [discovery] matters, where trial pleadings in the case are not at issue, and where trial testimony has no bearing on the sanctions dispute, would be to violate the very essence of Remington Arms ”
• noting that the postponement of “rulings on completed pretrial [discovery] matters, where trial pleadings in the case are not at issue, and where trial testimony has no bearing on the sanctions dispute, would be to violate the very essence of Remington Amis ”
• “Sanctions for alleged violations known to movants before trial are waived if a hearing and ruling are not secured pretrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).