Finkler v. Minisceongo Golf Club, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere possibility amendment of an information may result in a more severe penalty due to the addition of charges is not, of itself, prejudice
• holding that the mere possibility amendment of an information may result in a more severe penalty due to the addition of charges is not, of itself, prejudice
• stating that evidence that a defendant drove in excess of 100 miles per hour while weaving through traffic, and refused to stop for a police roadblock, is sufficient to support a verdict for recklessly endangering another person
• stating an amendment may be proper even on the day of trial where “there is no showing of prejudice” to the defendant
• evidence that defendant drove at high speed, forced several vehicles off roadway and refused to stop for police road blocks was sufficient to demonstrate reckless endangerment
• if there is no showing of prejudice, amendment of information to add an additional charge is proper even on the day of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).