Finkelstein v. S. H. Kress & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unless a lack of jurisdiction affirmatively appears on the record, the prior findings of the court of compliance with all the provisions of law entitling the tax purchaser to a tax deed cannot be disputed in a collateral proceeding
• unless a lack of jurisdiction affirmatively appears on the record, the prior findings of the court of compliance with all the provisions of law entitling the tax purchaser to a tax deed cannot be disputed in a collateral proceeding
• after 1951 revision of section 266 of the Revenue Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 120, ¶ 747), predecessor to section 22-45 of the Property Tax Code, as well as the 1955 revision of section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 110, ¶ 72
• after 1951 revision of section 266 of the Revenue Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 120, ¶ 747), predecessor to section 22-45 of the Property Tax Code, as well as the 1955 revision of section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 110, ¶ 72
• after 1951 revision of section 266 of the Revenue Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 120, ¶ 747), predecessor to section 22-45 of the Property Tax Code, as well as the 1955 revision of section 72 of the Civil -6- Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, ch. 110, ¶ 72

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).