Finkelstein v. Mardkha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Supreme Court ... chose instead to remand on the reliance issue. The necessary inference to be drawn is that the Supreme Court agreed with [the initial bankruptcy judge’s] finding [on the causation issue].”
• \The Supreme Court . . . chose instead to remand on the reliance issue. The necessary inference to be drawn is that the Supreme Court agreed with [the initial bankruptcy judge's] finding [on the causation issue].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).